Definition of things
- 2 hours ago
- 2 min read
When a really bad person leaves our life, is it okay to miss the good parts of them? Is it okay to look for those same qualities in other people? Or is that a quiet betrayal of oneself?
Someone recently asked me if everything needs a definition. If we are aware of what we feel, grateful for it, and mindful of where it comes from—why do we need to name it at all? Can something be meaningful without being clearly defined? There is a certain beauty in what remains unsaid.
There certainly is beauty in some things which remain unsaid. But unsaid is only beautiful when the mind receiving it is gentle. Otherwise, it becomes confusing—misleading even. It leaves space for doubt, for interpretation, for questions that keep circling without answers. What isn’t named can just as easily be misunderstood.
Definitions, then, are not just about clarity. They are about alignment. They allow two people to stand in the same place while using the same words. In a world where what feels like red to me might look like blue to you, defining red becomes necessary—not to restrict meaning, but to share it.
And sometimes, definitions are protection.
When one grows up without a clear understanding of what love is supposed to feel like, the word becomes easy to misuse. It can be stretched, shaped, and offered in ways that asks too much of us. One begins to accept things under the name of love that they might not have, had they known its boundaries.
Maybe not everything needs to be defined. But some things do—especially the ones that have the power to be used against us.
Because what we fail to define, we often fail to defend.



Comments